Quad

Key differences on Outcomes

  1. 1

    Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim graduates 1 pts more of its students than Clinton (16% vs. 15%)

    Graduation rate

Outcomes

Outcomes

Earnings and finishing

Median earnings, 10 yrs
Clinton$30.2K
Yeshiva Shaar EphraimNot reported
Graduation rate
Clinton15%
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim16%
Retention rate
Clinton58%
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim55%

Borrowing

Median debt
Clinton$29K
Yeshiva Shaar EphraimNot reported
Undergrads with a federal loan
Clinton89%
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim0%
Median debt, Pell Grant recipients
ClintonNot reported
Yeshiva Shaar EphraimNot reported

Eight-year outcomes

Credential within 4 years, all students
Clinton7%
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim16%
Credential within 8 years, all students
Clinton8%
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim16%
Enrolled at another college, 8 years on
Clinton2%
Yeshiva Shaar Ephraim40%

Graduation by group

Graduated in 6 years, Pell Grant recipients
ClintonNot shown: under 30 students
Yeshiva Shaar EphraimNot shown: under 30 students
Graduated in 6 years, neither Pell nor subsidized loan
Clinton0%
Yeshiva Shaar EphraimNot reported
Pell graduation gap
ClintonNot reported
Yeshiva Shaar EphraimNot reported

Graduated in 6 years, by race and ethnicity

GroupClintonYeshiva Shaar Ephraim
WhiteNot reported6%
AsianNot shown: under 30 studentsNot reported
Hispanic/LatinoNot reportedNot reported
Black14%Not reported
Two or more racesNot shown: under 30 studentsNot reported
InternationalNot reportedNot reported

All outcome numbers in the table

Sources:College Scorecard, most recent release;College Scorecard, Entered fall 2023;College Scorecard, 2023–24;IPEDS Outcome Measures survey, Students entering fall 2016;IPEDS Graduation Rates survey (Pell Grant and subsidized loan recipients), Entered fall 2018About the data(retrieved 2026-10-12)

Figures are the newest each college has published; years can differ between colleges. Each value's ⓘ shows its source and year. Why