Quad

Head-to-head

Key differences

The biggest gaps between these schools, largest first.

  1. 1

    California Institute of Technology's yield is 25 pts higher than Harvey Mudd's

    Yield rate
  2. 2

    California Institute of Technology is 4.8× more selective than Harvey Mudd

    Acceptance rate
  3. 3

    California Institute of Technology costs about $12.1K less per year on average than Harvey Mudd ($48,523 vs. $60,672, all students)

    Average cost, all students
  4. 4

    California Institute of Technology's grants cover 44% of its full price on average, vs. 33% at Harvey Mudd

    Aid generosity
  5. 5

    Harvey Mudd grads earn $10.1K more ten years out than California Institute of Technology's ($138,687 vs. $128,566)

    Median earnings, 10 yrs
  6. 6

    Harvey Mudd is more diverse (index 0.82 vs. 0.78)

    Diversity index

The shape of each school

Each axis is a national rank among 4-year colleges; further out = more of it.

SelectivityTest scoresSizePell shareFirst-genDiversity

Hollow dots at the center mean that measure isn't reported.

Who's hardest to get into

California Institute of Technology admits 2.6%, Harvey Mudd 12%; California Institute of Technology's yield is higher, at 61%.

Acceptance rate
Harvey Mudd12%
California Institute of Technology2.6%
Quad's selectivity
  • Harvey MuddHighly selective
  • California Institute of TechnologyUltra selective
SAT middle 50%Axis 1400–1600
Harvey Mudd
1500–1560
California Institute of TechnologyTest-blind
How they read a recordfirst-years at 3.75+
  • Harvey MuddRigor and GPA very important
  • California Institute of TechnologySchool record required

Who's on each campus

Harvey Mudd and California Institute of Technology are about the same size; California Institute of Technology has the larger Pell share.

Undergrads
Harvey Mudd921
California Institute of Technology987
Pell Grant share
Harvey Mudd15%
California Institute of Technology18%

Majors and faculty

Engineering leads at Harvey Mudd, and Computer Science at California Institute of Technology.

Students per faculty member
Harvey Mudd8 to 1
California Institute of Technology3 to 1
Most popular majorshare of graduates
  • Harvey MuddEngineering, General29%
  • California Institute of TechnologyComputer Science35%

What each costs

California Institute of Technology costs about $12.1K less a year than Harvey Mudd on average, and its grants cover the larger share of its price.

Average cost, all students
Harvey Mudd$60.7K
California Institute of Technology$48.5K
Aid generosity
Harvey Mudd33%
California Institute of Technology44%

What each pays off

Harvey Mudd's former students earn more, a median $138.7K ten years after enrolling; both graduate more than 90% within six years.

Median earnings, 10 years
Harvey Mudd$138.7K
California Institute of Technology$128.6K
Graduation rate
Harvey Mudd93%
California Institute of Technology95%

How each has changed

Applications grew at both; California Institute of Technology got more selective while Harvey Mudd held steady.

Applications, 10-year change
  • Harvey MuddGrowing+39%
  • California Institute of TechnologyGrowing+112%
All the numbersEvery figure for these colleges in one table, with differences highlighted.
Sources for this comparisonEvery dataset and year behind the numbers in this comparison; tap any ⓘ for one number's source

Figures are the newest each college has published; years can differ between colleges. Each value's ⓘ shows its source and year. Why