Quad

Head-to-head

Key differences

The biggest gaps between these schools, largest first.

  1. 1

    California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo grads earn $16.8K more ten years out than U. Connecticut's ($90,768 vs. $73,997)

    Median earnings, 10 yrs
  2. 2

    California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo costs about $8.1K less per year on average than U. Connecticut ($28,156 vs. $36,262, all students)

    Average cost, all students
  3. 3

    California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo's yield is 9 pts higher than U. Connecticut's

    Yield rate
  4. 4

    California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo is 1.7× more selective than U. Connecticut

    Acceptance rate
  5. 5

    U. Connecticut's grants cover 27% of its full price on average, vs. 20% at California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo

    Aid generosity
  6. 6

    U. Connecticut has 6 pts more Pell recipients than California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo (25% vs. 19%)

    Pell Grant recipients

The shape of each school

Each axis is a national rank among 4-year colleges; further out = more of it.

SelectivityTest scoresSizePell shareFirst-genDiversity

Hollow dots at the center mean that measure isn't reported.

Who's hardest to get into

California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo admits 31%, U. Connecticut 52%; California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo's yield is higher, at 25%.

Acceptance rate
U. Connecticut52%
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo31%
Quad's selectivity
  • U. ConnecticutVery selective
  • California Polytechnic State University-San Luis ObispoVery selective
SAT middle 50%Axis 1100–1600
U. Connecticut
1210–1440
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis ObispoTest-blind
How they read a recordfirst-years at 3.75+
  • U. ConnecticutGPA, school record, and prep program required
  • California Polytechnic State University-San Luis ObispoGPA, school record, and prep program required

Who's on each campus

California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo is a bit larger than U. Connecticut (21,996 vs. 19,835 undergrads); U. Connecticut has the larger Pell share.

Undergrads
U. Connecticut19.8K
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo22K
Pell Grant share
U. Connecticut25%
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo19%

Majors and faculty

Psychology leads at U. Connecticut, and Business Administration and Management at California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo.

Students per faculty member
U. Connecticut17 to 1
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo19 to 1
Most popular majorshare of graduates
  • U. ConnecticutPsychology, General8%
  • California Polytechnic State University-San Luis ObispoBusiness Administration and Management, General15%

What each costs

California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo costs about $8.1K less a year than U. Connecticut on average.

Average cost, all students
U. Connecticut$36.3K
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo$28.2K
Aid generosity
U. Connecticut27%
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo20%

What each pays off

California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo's former students earn more, a median $90.8K ten years after enrolling.

Median earnings, 10 years
U. Connecticut$74K
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo$90.8K
Graduation rate
U. Connecticut83%
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo87%

How each has changed

Applications grew at both; selectivity held steady at both.

Applications, 10-year change
  • U. ConnecticutGrowing+77%
  • California Polytechnic State University-San Luis ObispoGrowing+56%
All the numbersEvery figure for these colleges in one table, with differences highlighted.
Sources for this comparisonEvery dataset and year behind the numbers in this comparison; tap any ⓘ for one number's source

Figures are the newest each college has published; years can differ between colleges. Each value's ⓘ shows its source and year. Why