Quad

Head-to-head

Key differences

The biggest gaps between these schools, largest first.

  1. 1

    U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences graduates 23 pts more of its students than New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (83% vs. 60%)

    Graduation rate
  2. 2

    U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences has 13 pts more first-gen students than New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (40% vs. 26%)

    First-generation students
  3. 3

    U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences has 1.6× as many undergrads as New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Undergrads
  4. 4

    New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology grads earn $2.7K more ten years out than U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences's ($76,489 vs. $73,827)

    Median earnings, 10 yrs
  5. 5

    New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology has 2 pts more Pell recipients than U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences (30% vs. 28%)

    Pell Grant recipients
  6. 6

    U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences is more diverse (index 0.64 vs. 0.62)

    Diversity index

The shape of each school

Each axis is a national rank among 4-year colleges; further out = more of it.

SelectivityTest scoresSizePell shareFirst-genDiversity

Hollow dots at the center mean that measure isn't reported.

Who's hardest to get into

New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology admits 44%; U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences doesn't report an acceptance rate.

Acceptance rate
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology44%
U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesNot reported
Quad's selectivity
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and TechnologySelective
  • U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesNot rated
SAT middle 50%Axis 1000–1600
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
1080–1310
U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesNot reported
How they read a recordfirst-years at 3.75+
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and TechnologyGPA and school record required74%
  • U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesNot reported

Who's on each campus

U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences has 1.6× as many undergrads as New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.

Undergrads
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology995
U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences1.6K
Pell Grant share
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology30%
U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences28%

Majors and faculty

Mechanical Engineering leads at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, and Clinical Laboratory Science/Medical Technology/Technologist at U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Students per faculty member
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology9 to 1
U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences16 to 1
Most popular majorshare of graduates
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and TechnologyMechanical Engineering21%
  • U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesClinical Laboratory Science/Medical Technology/Technologist62%

What each costs

Only New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology reports an average cost ($12.3K).

Average cost, all students
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology$12.3K
U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesNot reported
Aid generosity
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology52%
U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesNot reported

What each pays off

New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology's former students earn more, a median $76.5K ten years after enrolling.

Median earnings, 10 years
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology$76.5K
U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences$73.8K
Graduation rate
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology60%
U. Arkansas for Medical Sciences83%

How each has changed

Applications grew at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, which got less selective.

Applications, 10-year change
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and TechnologyGrowing+54%
  • U. Arkansas for Medical SciencesNot reported
All the numbersEvery figure for these colleges in one table, with differences highlighted.
Sources for this comparisonEvery dataset and year behind the numbers in this comparison; tap any ⓘ for one number's source

Figures are the newest each college has published; years can differ between colleges. Each value's ⓘ shows its source and year. Why